P.Vinayagam v. a.Ramdoss
Case brief
What is this about?
This order in a contempt petition closes the matter after the petitioner confirmed compliance with the order dated 24.06.2019 passed in the underlying writ petition regarding eviction from land.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed as the petitioner confirmed compliance with the earlier order.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD)No.519 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.11.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P.(MD)No.519 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.12166 of 2019
P.Vinayagam
: Petitioner/4th Respondent
Vs.
A.Ramdoss, The Tahsildar, Watrap Taluk, Watrap, Virudhunagar District.
: Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent herein for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court made in W.P.(MD) No.12166 of 2019 dated 24.06.2019 under the Contempt of Court Act.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order passed in W.P.(MD) No.12166 of 2019 dated 24.06.2019 has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Vinayagam
- respondent
A. Ramdoss
Coram
N. Kirubakaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court