Disposed

M/s.Koya and Company Construction Limited v. P.Ramachandran

Madras HC7 Oct 2020CONT P(MD)/225/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, in a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a writ order, held that the order dated 19.03.2019 had been complied with based on counsel's submission. Consequently, the court closed the contempt petition without further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition is closed as the impugned order has been complied with.

M/s.Koya and Company Construction Limited Vs P.Ramachandran — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Cont. P(MD)No.225 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.10.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.225 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.6409 of 2019

¶3

M/s.Koya & Company Construction Limited, Rep.by its Project Manager, A.Ravikumar, No.72, MIGH, Mehadipatnam, Hyderabad – 500 028.

¶4

... Petitioner Vs.

¶5

1.P.Ramachandran, The Chief Engineer, TWAD Board, Ganesh Nagar, Near Law College Hostel, Opp.Mattuthavani Bus Stand, Melur Road, Madurai – 625 007.

¶6

2.Viswalingam The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Urban Division, 62/8, Second Floor, New Road, Kovilpatti – 628 501.

¶7

3.G.Kathiresan, The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Project Division, Jawahar 3^rd Street, Nagercoil.

¶8

4.Dr.C.N.Mahesvaran, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, No.31, Kamarajarsalai, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. ... Respondents/Contemnors

¶9

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.M.P.(MD) No.5125 of 2019 in W.P.(MD)No.6409 of 2019, dated 19.03.2019.

¶10

Prayer in WP(MD).6409/ 2019 :

¶11

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

1/3

¶13

Cont. P(MD)No.225 of 2020

¶14

passed by the 2^nd respondent in his proceedings Lr.No.F.Kovilpatti WSIS/JDO/2016/dated 02.03.2019 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary.

¶15

Prayer in WMP(MD). 5125/ 2019 :

¶16

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant an order of Interim Stay of the operations and all further proceedings of the impugned order passed by the 2^nd respondent in his proceedings Lr.No.F.Kovilpatti WSIS/JDO/2016/dated 02.03.2019, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶17

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on either side stated that the order dated 19.03.2019 passed by this Court has been complied with.

¶18

Recording the said submission, this Contempt petition is closed.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

das

¶22

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶23

¶24

1.The Chief Engineer, TWAD Board, Ganesh Nagar, Near Law College Hostel, Opp.Mattuthavani Bus Stand, Melur Road, Madurai – 625 007.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

1/3

¶27

Cont. P(MD)No.225 of 2020

¶28

2.The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Urban Division, 62/8, Second Floor, New Road, Kovilpatti – 628 501.

¶29

3.The Executive Engineer, TWAD Board, Project Division, Jawahar 3^rd Street, Nagercoil.

¶30

4.Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, No.31, Kamarajarsalai, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.

¶31

Cont. P(MD)No.225 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.6409 of 2019 07.10.2020

¶32

SCR(CO) CS(14.10.2020) 3P 5C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

1/3

M/s.Koya and Company Construction Limited v. P.Ramachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Koya and Company Construction Limited v. P.Ramachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanasekaran Vs Manju

V.Rajendran Vs The Superintendent of police

V.Rajendran Vs The Superintendent of police

D.Kumarathi Ammal Vs G.Arun Prasath

R.Kumar Vs Thirumalai Vasan

Sriram Ganapathy Vs The Inspector of Police