Abdul Rajak v. T. Arun Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
Patron accepted the respondent's submission that the passport had already been despatched, leaving nothing to consider. The contempt petition was consequently closed without any substantive decision.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P(MD).No.199 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.07.2020 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont P(MD).No.199 of 2020 in
W.P.(MD).No.25386 of 2019
Abdul Rajak ...Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
T.Arun Prasad, The Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai-625 002.
...Respondent / Contemnor
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for his willful disobedience to the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.25386 of 2019 dated 29.11.2019 and punish him accordingly.
Prayer in WP(MD)No.25386 of 2019
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice in file no.MD1072543651319 dated 5.11.2019 and quash same as illegal consequently directing the respondent no.1 to issue passport to the petitioner by considering his passport application in File no.MD1072543651319 dt 25.10.2019
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abdul Rajak
- respondent
T.Arun Prasad
Coram
G.R.Swaminathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court