Dismissed

T.Shanmugasundaram v. K.v.v.G.Diwakar, I.R.S

Madras HC16 Mar 2020CONT P(MD)/1319/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This contempt petition was filed to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying a previous order in W.P.(MD). No.2043 of 2016. The Court held that since a review petition (W.A.(MD).No.1243 of 2019) was filed against the original order, contempt proceedings could not be maintained and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition dismissed as contempt may not lie while a review petition is pending against the original order.

T.Shanmugasundaram Vs K.v.v.G.Diwakar, I.R.S — Customs and Excise | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Cont.P(MD)No.1319 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.03.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Cont.P(MD)No.1319 of 2019 in W.P.(MD).No.2043 of 2016

¶7

T.Shanmugasundaram : Contempt Petitioner/ Writ Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

K.V.V.G.Diwakar, I.R.S., The Commissioner of Customs, New Harbour Estate, Tuticorin-628 004.

¶10

: Contemnor / Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent / contemnor wilful and wantonly disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.P.(MD). No.2043 of 2016 dated 26.07.2018.

¶12

Prayer in WP(MD). 2043/ 2016 :

¶13

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the Respondent in and connected with Show cause notice in C.No.VIII/13/33/2012-CHAL dated 11.11.2015 seeking to revoke the Customs Broker License, forfeit the security deposit and impose penalty under the provisions of the Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, 2013 and quash the same as it is without jurisdiction, contrary to law and mandate of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sathis Sundar

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan, Senior Standing counsel.

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent herein for the wilful disobedience of the order made in W.P.(MD).No.2043 of 2016, dated 26.07.2018.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

Cont.P(MD)No.1319 of 2019

¶21

It is stated that W.A.(MD).No.1243 of 2019, has been filed against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.2043 of 2016 dated 26.07.2018. Hence, contempt may not lie.

¶22

In view of the above, the Contempt Petition stands dismissed.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar (AD-II)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

tsg

¶28

¶29

The Commissioner of Customs, New Harbour Estate,

¶30

Tuticorin-628 004.

¶31

+1 CC to Mr.B.VIJAY KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-12167[F] dated 18/03/2020 )

¶32

Cont.P(MD)No.1319 of 2019 in W.P.(MD).No.2043 of 2016 16.03.2020

¶33

VB(06.05.2020) 2P 3C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

T.Shanmugasundaram v. K.v.v.G.Diwakar, I.R.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Shanmugasundaram v. K.v.v.G.Diwakar, I.R.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matchakalai Vs the Superintending Engineer

Gnanasekaran Vs the Revenue Divisionalofficer

I.Edwin Jose Vs The Colachel Municipality

S.Peter Raj Vs the District Registrar of Societies

A.K.Sivasankaran, Vs the District Collector

K.Kirubakar Vs The Regional Transport Authority