The Manager/Authorized Officer v. Hitesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of an order in W.P. 13610 of 2019 was closed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court upon recording that the earlier order had been complied with in letter and spirit by the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed upon recording compliance with the earlier order.
What the court decided
CONT.P.(MD)No.107 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.03.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
CONT.P.(MD).No.107 of 2020 in W.P.(MD)No.13610 of 2019
The Manager / Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, No.72, P.T.Rajan Road, Opp.Kendra Vidyalaya, B.B.Kulam, Madurai-2.
..Petitioner/4th Respondent
Vs. Hitesh Kumar ..Contemnor/Writ Petitioner
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the contemnor / Writ Petitioner herein for his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.13610 of 2019, dated 27.06.2019.
Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.13610 of 2019 : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner, dated 13.6.2019 under Section 17(4-A) of the SARFAESI(Amended) Act,2016(44 of 2016) in his proceedings in ROC.No.C6/33650/2018, dated 30.05.2019.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed owing to the compliance of the earlier order.
Whether the representation regarding Section 17(4-A) of the SARFAESI Act was considered in the earlier writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
The Manager / Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India
- appellant
Hitesh Kumar
Coram
S.S.SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court