R.P.Subramanian v. Dr.Sai Kumar Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposal of a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The respondent reported compliance with an earlier order by releasing terminal benefits to the petitioner, leading the court to close the petition.
What did the court decide?
[Petitioner] terminal benefits released; Contempt Petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 13.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
Cont.P.No.2725 of 2016
Mr.R.P.Balasubramanian .. Petitioner
Vs
1. Dr.Sai Kumar I.A.S.,
The Chariman cum Managing Director,
TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai,
TNEB Complex, 144, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002.
2. K.Subash Chandra Bose,
The Chief Engineer/Hydro,
TANGEDCO, NPKRR Maaligai,
TNEB Complex, 144, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002. .. Respondents
Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondents for disobedience of the Order of this Court dated 18.07.2016 made in W.P.No.24623 of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.Karthik Rajan, for TNEB
1/3
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. R.P. Balasubramanian
- respondent
Dr. Sai Kumar I.A.S.
- respondent
K. Subash Chandra Bose
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court