M.M.Ramaswamy v. Rajamanickam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court orders the contempt petition to be closed after the respondent produces an order complying with the previous impugned order, waiving the need for punishment.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No. 238 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 14.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Cont.P.No. 238 of 2020
M.M.Ramasamy .. Petitioner
..Vs..
Mr.Rajamanickam
The Joint Commissioner
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore 641 018. .. Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the orders passed in W.P.No.1546 of 2019 dated 29.01.2019.
The learned Special Government Pleader has produced an order
passed by the Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department in Na.Ka.No.
117/2019/A3/Date/31.10.2019, as against this appeal is filed before the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.M. Ramasamy
- respondent
Mr. Rajamanickam
Coram
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court