S.Rajangam v. Dr.S.Vijayakumar I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition alleged wilful disobedience of a prior court order. During the hearing, the Government Pleader submitted that the order in the underlying writ petition had been complied with. Accordingly, the Court closed the petition without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
the Contempt Petition stands closed based on submission of compliance by the respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P No. 2090 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.11.2020
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Cont P No. 2090 of 2015
1.S.Rajangam
2.NThirukasu ..Petitioners
Vs.
1.Dr.S.Vijayakumar I.A.S.,
The Secretary to Government,
Animal Husbandry, Dairying &
Fisheries Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.Thiru.T.Abraham I.A.S.,
Commissioner of Animal Husbandry
& Veterinary Services,
Vepery,
Chennai – 600 006.
3.Thiru.Kanniappan,
The Assistant Director,
Department of Animal Husbandry,
Ramanathapuram. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.A.No. 226 of 2012, dated 05.11.2013.
Page No.1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed when the order complained of has been complied with?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.S.Rajangam (and another)
- respondent
1.Dr.S.Vijayakumar I.A.S. (and others)
Coram
M.M.SUNDRESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court