A.Sekar v. Hans Raj Verma, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a contempt petition challenging non-compliance of a prior order. The Court recorded a statement confirming compliance by respondents and closed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1549 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.02.2020
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.1549 of 2016
- 1 A.Sekar S/o.Arumugam, Forest Watcher, Radhapuram East Forest Beat Sathanur Forest Range Thiruvannamalai South Division,
- Vellore Circle.
- 2 J.Kannan
- S/o.Janakiraman Forest Watcher, Thandarampattu East Forest Beat Sathanur Dam Range Thiruvannamalai Division Vellore
- Circle.
- 3 J.Chockalingam
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Sekar
- petitioner
J.Kannan
- petitioner
J.Chockalingam
- respondent
Hans Raj Verma
- respondent
N.Krishnakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court