Disposed

A.Senbagavalli v. Dr. R. Narayanababu

Madras HC14 Feb 2020CONT P/138/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance of a September 2019 order directing grievance disposal. The High Court found that the respondents produced the requisite letter dated December 23, 2019, establishing compliance and closed the petition without further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition stands closed as the order is found to be complied with.

A.Senbagavalli Vs Dr. R. Narayanababu — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Contempt Petition No.138 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.02.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Contempt Petition No.138 of 2020

¶7

A.Senbagavalli ... Petitioner -vs1.Dr.R.Narayanababi The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai.-10 2.Dr.Mrs.Swathi Rathinasamy The Director of Medical & Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer: This Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of this Court order made in W.P.No.21221/2019 dated 12.09.2019.

¶9

For Petitioner :: Mr.T.Saravanan For Respondents :: Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This Court by an order dated 12.09.2019 disposed of the Writ

¶12

Petition No.21221/2019, directing the respondent to consider the

¶13

petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2019 and dispose of the same in

¶14

accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/3

¶17

Contempt Petition No.138 of 2020

¶18

of a copy of this order. Since the order has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.

¶19

2.Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

¶20

appearing for the respondents would submit that the order has been complied with and he produced the copy of letter issued by the office of the director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai, Ref. NO.74940/N2/2/2019, dated 23.12.2019 before this Court. The said letter is taken on file and recorded.

¶21

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, no further adjudication is required. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed. SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶22

jrs

¶23

Dated at Madras this the day of 2020.

¶24

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶25

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

2/3

¶28

Contempt Petition No.138 of 2020

¶29

SMI/22.09.2020

¶30

¶31

The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai.-10

¶32

The Director of Medical & Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

3/3

A.Senbagavalli v. Dr. R. Narayanababu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Senbagavalli v. Dr. R. Narayanababu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Deputy Superintendent of Vs T.Ratnapandian

Rajesh Malhotra Vs a.R.Sridharan, 59 Yrs

R.Elayaselvan Vs City Public Prosecutor

S.Viswambaram Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Mr.E.Murugan Vs Thamizharasi .P

S.Murali Vs the Inspector of Police