The petitioner filed a Contempt Petition for violation of an earlier order. On hearing, it was jointly submitted that the order was duly complied with. Recording the same, the contempt petition was closed. No punishment is awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.1023 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Cont.P.No.1023/2020 A.Alagarpillai ... Petitioner -vsMr.P.Durairasu, I.F.S., Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-15. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court dated 27.03.2018 in W.P.No.7122/2018.
For Petitioner : Ms.K.Jenitha For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai, Addl.G.P.
1/2
Cont.P.1023 of 2020
O R D E R
The Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the
respondent herein for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court dated 27.03.2018 in W.P.No.7122/2018.
petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing
for the respondent contemnor jointly submitted that the order of this Court
has been duly complied with.
Dated at Madras this the day of 2020.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SMI/30/12/2020
2/2
A. Alagarpillai
Mr. P. Durairasu, I.F.S.
T. RAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
