The single judge allowed an applicant's petition in a company liquidation matter where the Deputy Official Liquidator did not oppose the prayer and the court was satisfied it served the larger public interest.
Instant application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Company Application No.96 of 2020 in
Company Petition No.255 of 2014
M.SUNDAR.J.,
Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier
proceedings dated 13.03.2020 and 07.08.2020.
application and Mr.Bavisetty Sridhar, learned 'Deputy Official Liquidator' ('Deputy OL' for brevity) representing the 'Official Liquidator attached to this Court' ('OL' for the sake of brevity), who is the sole respondent in the captioned application are before this Court on a videoconferencing platform.
3.Adverting to earlier proceedings dated 13.03.2020, learned
counsel submits that a better affidavit has since been filed and the same has been placed before me.
of better affidavit. As Deputy OL representing the OL does not oppose
this application, I am not extracting paragraphs 5 and 6 of better affidavit filed in support of instant application.
1/2
M.SUNDAR.J.,
gpa/sgl
Having perused the better affidavit, having noticed that Deputy OL
representing the OL does not oppose or object this application and being
satisfied that the prayer deserves to be acceded to in larger public
interest, instant application is allowed. No costs.
21.08.2020
gpa/sgl
Company Application No.96 of 2020 in
Company Petition No.255 of 2014
2/2
Applicant
Official Liquidator
M.SUNDAR.J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
