Thirumal v. Ambiga
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed by a husband regarding marriage dissolution was dismissed as infructuous because the parties reached a settlement during proceedings. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.10.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
C.M.S.A.No.9 of 2018
Thirumal ..Appellant/Respondent/ Petitioner Versus Ambiga ..Respondent/Appellant/ Respondent
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code read with Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against the judgment and decree passed in C.M.A.No.11 of 2017, dated 06.12.2017, on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri, reversing the decree and judgment made in H.M.O.P.No.13 of 2015, dated 10.03.2017, on the file of the learned Sub-Court, Uthangarai.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent : Mr.S.Viswanathan for M/s.Dass and Viswa Associates O R D E R
Heard the parties through Video Conferencing due to COVID-19 pandemic.
- When the matter is taken up, both Mr.V.Elangovan, learned counsel for the appellant/husband, and Mr.S.Viswanathan, learned counsel for the respondent/wife, have jointly made a statement that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore, the appeal filed by the husband may be dismissed as infructuous.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous second appeal filed by the husband should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Thirumal
- respondent
Ambiga
Coram
T. Raja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court