Allowed

S.Mariyakaanikkai v. Boopathy

Madras HC1 Jun 2020CMP(MD)/3029/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a petition for condonation of a 148-day delay in filing a second appeal (S.A.(MD)SR.66839 of 2019), subject to the payment of court fees and strict compliance with the timeline for fee deposition.

What did the court decide?

The petition to condone delay of 148 days was allowed on condition that court fees of Rs.200/- be paid within the stipulated time.

S.Mariyakaanikkai Vs Boopathy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.3029 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶4

Monday, the First day of June Two Thousand and Twenty

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶7

CMP(MD) No.3029 of 2020 in SA(MD)SR.No.66839 of 2019

¶8

S.MARIYAKAANIKKAI ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶9

BOOPATHY

¶10

S.GANDHIMATHI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶11

Prayer in CMP(MD). 3029/ 2020 :

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 148 days in representing the above SA(MD) SR.No.66839 of 2019.

¶13

Prayer in SA(MD)SR.No.66839 of 2019

¶14

To set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 29.03.2019 made in A.S.No.304 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Trichy by confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 03.09.2012 made in O.S.No. 107 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Trichy.

¶15

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.DEVARAJ, Advocate for the petitioner the court made the following order:-

¶16

The petition is filed to condone the delay of 148 days in representing the second appeal in S.A.(MD)No.SR66839 of 2019.

¶17

Though the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition are not satisfactory, an opportunity for the petitioner is to be given. Hence, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of Rs.200/- (Rupees Two Hundred only) to the credit of the

¶18

¶19

CMP(MD) No.3029 of 2020

¶20

“District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam” (payable in Account No.10767823177, SBI, Periyakulam), on or before 10.06.2020. Failing which, this petition stands automatically dismissed.

¶21

sd/01/06/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

THE PRINCIPAL SUBORDINATE COURT, TRICHY.

¶24

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF II, TRICHY.

¶25

THE DISTRICT SIDDA MEDICAL OFFICER, CCRI, PERIYAKULAM.

¶26

ORDER

¶27

IN CMP(MD) No.3029 of 2020 in SA(MD)SR.No.66839 of 2019 Date :01/06/2020 MRN SRS/ VR/ SAR-III/ 03.06.2020/ 2P/4C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

S.Mariyakaanikkai v. Boopathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Mariyakaanikkai v. Boopathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundararajan Vs Pushparani

K.Haja Mohammed Vs M.Saithabanu

Ilanko Pandian, Vs Chelliah

Mariappan Vs M.Poongavanam

Udayakumar Vs Eswara Vadivu

R.Karthikeyan Vs P.Ezhilarasi