In a condonation of delay petition, the Court allowed a 218-day delay in filing a Writ Appeal, treating the filing time as sufficient based on the explained affidavit, and assigned a regular appeal number.
The delay condonation petition is allowed; the appeal is treated to be within time and given a regular number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.6560 of 2020 in WA.SR.No.27947 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.07.2020
CORAM :
The Hon'ble Mr.A.P.SAHI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY C.M.P.No.6560 of 2020 in W.A.SR.No.27947 of 2020
S.Tulasi Ammal .. Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Principal Secretary
Commissioner of Revenue Administration
Revenue Administration and Disaster
Management Department, Ezhilagam
Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
2. The District Collector
Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.
3. The Tahsildar, Thirukalukundram Taluk
Kancheepuram District. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the
delay of 218 days in filing the Writ Appeal.
For Petitioner : Mr.Saravanan
for Mr.L.Uthaya Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.Kamalesh Kannan
Government Advocate
Page 1 of 3
C.M.P.No.6560 of 2020 in WA.SR.No.27947 of 2020
O R D E R
(Order made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Advocate. We see no reason to oppose the condonation of delay, which has been sufficiently explained in the affidavit filed in support of the petition.
Page 2 of 3
C.M.P.No.6560 of 2020 in WA.SR.No.27947 of 2020
The Hon'ble Chief Justice and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
(kst)
C.M.P.No.6560 of 2020
in WA.SR.No.27947 of 2020
28.07.2020
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Writ Appeal should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Tulasi Ammal
The Principal Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration
The District Collector, Kancheepuram
The Tahsildar, Thirukalukundram
A.P. Sahi
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
