The Court condoned a delay of 211 days in preferring a Writ Appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, finding sufficient cause shown, and directed listing of the appeal.
Condonation of delay of 211 days; appeal treated within time and listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.5236 of 2020 in WA SR No.17252 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.08.2020
CORAM :
The Hon'ble Mr.A.P.SAHI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
CMP No.5236 of 2020
in A SR No.17252 of 2020
Vs
1 S.K.BOOPATHY
2 S.V.VENKATESAN
Page 1 of 3
CMP No.5236 of 2020 in WA SR No.17252 of 2020
Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 211 days in preferring the appeal in WA SR No.17252 of 2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.Kunjithapatam Ramu
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
The Hon'ble Chief Justice
Page 2 of 3
CMP No.5236 of 2020 in WA SR No.17252 of 2020
and Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
sr
CMP No.5236 of 2020 in WA SR
No.17252 of 2020
03.08.2020
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause exists to condone the delay of 211 days in filing the Writ Appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Employees' Provident Fund Organization
Government of India
Management, Vellore District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd.
S.K. Boopathy
S.V. Venkatesan
P.N. Thanikachalam
A.P. Saha
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
