G.Srinivasan v. S.Mahadevi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a C.M.P. filed to condone delay in filing a CMA. Consequently, the CMA is closed due to non-payment of the required fee.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 25.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.M.P. No.5173 of 2020 in CMA.SR.No.16318 of 2020 and CMA.SR.No.16318 of 2020 (Heard through video-conferencing) G.Srinivasan S/o.Ganesa Gounder .. petitioner / appellant Versus S.Mahadevi W/o. G.Srnivasan .. respondent / respondent
Prayer in CMP.No.5173 of 2020: CMA filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 346 days in filing this CMA against IA.No.2724 of 2017 in HMOP No.1012 of 2015.
Prayer in CMA.No.SR.16318 of 2020: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Family Court Act to set aside the order dated 25.10.2018 made in IA.No.2724 of 2017 in HMOP.No.1012 of 2015 on the file of the V Additional Principal Family Court at Chennai.
For petitioner / appellant : No representation For respondent / respondent : Mr.Su.Srinivasan J U D G M E N T
This Court by order dated 12.08.2020, allowed the condone delay petition in filing the appeal, on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- to the learned counsel
Page numbers
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 346 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Srinivasan
- respondent
S.Mahadevi
Coram
R.SUBBIAH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court