Datchayani v. J.Valli
Case brief
What is this about?
A miscellaneous petition filed in 2018 seeking interim injunction to restrain alienation of specific property was closed as it served no useful purpose due to inordinate delay.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
CMP No.18449 of 2018
in AS.NO.668/2018
1 DATCHAYANI [ PETITIONERS ]
2 JAMUNADEVI
3 SANTHIDEVI
4 RAJASEKAR
5 YOGARAJAN
6 KRISHNARAJ
7 MAHARAJAN
Vs
1 J.VALLI [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 J.SANTHI
3 J.PARTHASARTHY
4 J.DILLIBABU
5 J.CHANDRA
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and
in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to
grant interim injunction restraining the respondents not to
alienate the schedule mentioned property to any manner
(CMP.NO.18449/2018) pending disposal of the above AS.668/2018
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY
All the piece and parcel of property situated at New NO.127 and old NO.55, Soliappan Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021, measuring 840 sq.ft or thereabouts and coming within the SubRegistration District of T.Nagar in S.NO.821, R.S.NO.2731 and C.C. NO.4273, bounded on the
North by : Rajan Naicker House South by : Shanmugam Chettiar House East by : Dhanalakshmiammal House West by : Solaiappan Street.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DATCHAYANI
- respondent
J.VALLI
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court