Suryakanth v. Gomathi
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition sought a stay of a decree by the Civil Court at Chennai pending disposal of the main appeal. The court examined the files, noted a prior interim stay granted in September 2016, and made that interim order absolute.
What did the court decide?
The interim order granted on 21.09.2016 was made absolute and the petition was disposed of according to rules.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Third day of July Two Thousand Twenty
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CMP No.14778 of 2016
IN AS.NO.574 OF 2016
SURYAKANTH [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 GOMATHI [ RESPONDENTS ]
2 WAHITA JETTY
3 THE MUTHIALPET BENEFIT FUND LTD.,
HAVING OFFICE AT NO.199,
THAMBU CHETTY STREET,
CHENNAI 600 001.
4 JAYAPALAN
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order staying the judgement and decree passed by the learned VI Additional District Judge City Civil Court at Chennai in O.S.No.9544 of 2010 dated 29.01.2016 (in CMP.14778/2016) pending disposal of the above appeal 14778/2016.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.K.DEEPA Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.SRINATH SRIDEVAN Advocate for the 1 & 2 respondents and 3 & 4 respondents not appearing either in person or by an Advocate the court made the following order:-
ORDER
In this miscellaneous petition, an order of interim stay was granted on 21.09.2016 and the matter has been kept pending till now. Hence, the interim order already granted is made absolute and this
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to make an interim stay order absolute pending disposal of the appeal.
Whether to dispose of the miscellaneous petition for interim relief.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suryakant
- respondent
Gomathi
- respondent
Wahita Jetty
- respondent
The Muthialpet Benefit Fund Ltd.
- respondent
Jayapalan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court