The court condoned a 51-day delay in filing the C.M.P. appeal as the Revenue appellant was served but the respondent was absent. The C.M.P. was admitted for post-admission notice to number and post for hearing.
Delay of 51 days in preferring appeal condoned; C.M.P. admitted for post-admission action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No.1346 of 2020 in W.A.SR.No.154690 of 2019
DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. AND R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the
appellant Revenue submits that the
Revenue has served the respondent.
However, none appears on behalf of
the respondent.
Hence, the delay of 51 days in
preferring the appeal is condoned and
the C.M.P. is ordered accordingly.
(V.K.,J.) (R.S.K,J.)
28.02.2020
KST
Note:
Office to number the
appeal and post for
admission after two
weeks.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the 51-day delay in filing the appeal and admit the C.M.P.
Revenue
Respondent
DR VINEET KOTHARI
R SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
