T.K.Sreedharan v. N.Kanagaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed against an interim order dismissed by the Madras High Court as infructuous based on an endorsement made by the appellant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.M.A.No.2980 of 2007
and M.P.No.1 of 2007
T.K.Sreedharan ...Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.N.Kanagaraj
2.Amirtham
3.Jayaprakash
4.Divakaran @ Suresh
5.Muthammal
6.Velumani
7.The Official Receiver,
District Courts Compound,
District Court,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
8.Ramasamy ...Respondents/Respondents
Appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 03.10.2007 passed in I.A.No.408 of 2007 in O.S.No,.206 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.D.Venkateswara Rao for Mr.P.Raja For Respondents: Mr.N.Damodaran (R2 & R8) R5 to R7 – no appearance R1, R3 & R4 – left
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.K.Sreedharan
- respondent
N.Kanagaraj
- respondent
Amirtham
- respondent
Jayaprakash
- respondent
Divakaran @ Suresh
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court