project 'Serene Kshetra', issued Planning Permission Certificate and the Authority also published the said project as structurally completed project in the official website as provided under Rule 2(h)(iii) of the Rules even without inspection of the project. But when the respondent gave a complaint before the Regulatory Authority, the Authority directed the Commissioner, Town and Country Planning, to undertake an inspection and submit a report. The Commissioner also after inspecting the project, submitted a report on 28.02.2018 stating that the project has not been completed. The said report was filed after the Act come into force. Therefore, the project called 'Serene Kshetra' has to be registered based on the Commissioner’s Report. The entire project has not been completed and falls under the ongoing project and it will not come under the provisions as specified under Rule 2(h)(iii) of the Rules. Therefore, the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, has rightly directed the appellant to register the project 'Serene Kshetra' under the RERA Act. Thereafter, on appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Authority has also elaborately discussed the legal and factual aspects and has rightly dismissed the appeal and there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Appellate Authority and therefore, the appeal is to be dismissed.
