3.It is seen that the above guardian O.P. petition has been filed seeking permission of the Court to appoint the first appellant as guardian for minors Suriya @ Subatheeshkumar, Dhanusri, Harisri and Pradeep and to permit him to sell the petition mentioned property on behalf of the above said minors. When it is the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the first appellant is in need of money for the educational expenses of minors and also for their maintenance and that there is no water facilities in the petition mentioned property and therefore cultivation is not possible, the appellants should have mentioned the better reasons, for which they are in need of money and they are not able to bear the expenses, namely, the School expenditure, Tuition fees, medical expenses, monthly maintenance etc. But, in the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, there is no mention about the expenses towards education and maintenance of the minors. Therefore, this Court, finding no infirmity in the impugned decretal order, grants liberty to the appellants to move an appropriate application with reasons, if any. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vga To 1.The Principal District Judge, Villupuram. 2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.D.Baskar Advocate SR.NO.33202 C.M.A. No.1491 of 2020 MP CO SDR 16/12/2020
