Dismissed

The Special Tahsildar (La), v. Ramuthayammal

Madras HC15 Dec 2020AS(MD)/608/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court heard a first appeal filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the land compensation award and decree of the Lower Court. The appellant was directed to deposit compensation while respondents were entitled to solatium and interest.

What did the court decide?

Appelant directed to deposit entire compensation with interest within six weeks; respondents entitled to solatium and interest.

The Special Tahsildar (La), Vs Ramuthayammal — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

AS(MD). No.608 of 2011

¶7

THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A) ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE, PERIYAKULAM.

¶8

... Appellant

¶9

¶10

1 Ramuthayammal, W/o.Krishnasamy Gounder,

¶11

2 Pounraj, S/o.Krishnasamy Gounder, 3 Vijaya, D/o.Krishnasamy Gounder,

¶12

4 Chandra, D/o.Krishnasamy Gounder,

¶13

5 Sathiyavanimuthu Gounder, S/o.Thottappa Gounder, All at South Raja Street, M.C.Puram, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer :- Appeal Suit filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against the award and Decree, dated 18.04.2005 made in LAOP No.6 of 1996 on the file of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge – Cum – Fast Track Court No.4, Madurai at Periyakulam.

¶16

Decree: This First Appeal coming up for hearing on Tuesday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty, upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the award and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.J. Gunaseelan Muthiah, Additional Government Pleader for the Appellant and of Mr. V.Janakiramulu, Advocate for the respondents, this Court having stood over for consideration till this day, doth order and decree as follows:-

¶17

1.That the award and decree dated 18.04.2005 made by the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge – cum – Fast Track Court No.4, Madurai at Periyakulam in LAOP. No. 6 of 1996 be and hereby are confirmed and this Appeal Suit is dismissed;

¶18

That the appellant be and hereby is directed to deposit the entire compensation along with interest within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

¶19

That the respondents/claimants be and hereby are entitled to solatium and interest as awarded by the Tribunal; and

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

That there be no costs in this Appeal Suit.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

¶28

1.The Additional District Judge – cum – Fast Track Court No.4, Madurai at Periyakulam

¶29

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai – 23 (2 copies)

¶30

+1 cc to Mr. V.Janakiramulu – Advocate CA SR. No.2584 +1 cc to Special Government Pleader CA SR. No.25718

¶31

Order Dated : 15.12.2020

¶32

DECREE

¶33

AS(MD). No.608 of 2011

¶34

Nature of Decree: Dismissing this first appeal by confirming the Decree and judgment dated 18.04.2005 made in LAOP No.6 of 1996 on the file of the Land Acquisition Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge – Cum – Fast Track Court No.4, Madurai at Periyakulam.

¶35

SV2(CO) TR(18.01.2021) 2P 6C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

2/2

The Special Tahsildar (La), v. Ramuthayammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Special Tahsildar (La), v. Ramuthayammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Sub Collector Vs M.Perumal Pillai

Amanulla Vs Jeyakumar

The Special Tahsildar Vs Sethuraman (Died)

The Special Tahsildar (L.a) Vs Subramani

The Special Tahsildar Vs M.K.S.Jeyaraj Nadar (Died)

Subbarayan(Died) Vs Ganesan