P.G.Anjinappa v. Sarathamma
Case brief
What is this about?
First Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Madras following a memo from the appellant confirming an out-of-court settlement between the parties. No costs awarded; court fees refunded.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Court fees refunded. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 11.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
AS. No.305 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013
P.G.Anjinappa .. Appellant/Plaintiff
Versus
1. Sarathamma
2. Anusuyamma
3. Pushpamma
4. Radha
5. Vasanthappa @ Vasantharamayya
6. Ananth
7. Nagarathina
8. Rani
9. Jayaramayya
10.Annapoornayya
11.L.Sabjahan
12.N.Ellappa
13.Babulal Kothari
14.Abinav Kothari
15.S.Atheek Basha
16.P.N.Veerachari
17.S.Najir .. Respondents/Defendants
[RR2,4,6,7 and 15 are ex-parte in Lower Court]
PRAYER: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and Decree dated 09.04.2013 made in O.S.No.17 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Court, Krishnagiri.
For appellants : Mr.V.Raghavachaari For respondents for R1 : R1-died for RR2,4,6,7 & 15 : Ex-parte before the Tribunal for R3 : Notice returned with an endorsement "incorrect address" for RR5, 11,12, 16 & 17: No Appearance for RR9 & 10 : Mr.V.Nicholas for R8 : Notice returned with an endorsement "no residence" for RR13 & 14 : Mr.K.Nagarajan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.G.Anjinappa
- respondent
Sarathamma
- respondent
Anusuyamma
- respondent
Pushpamma
- respondent
Radha
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court