The Court allowed the applicant/1st defendant to condone a delay of 89 days in filing the written statement in suit no. 474 of 2019 and accepted the document on record.
Delivery of written statement to file on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
A.No.488 of 2020
in
C.S.No.474 of 2019
S.Udhyashankar S/o.Shanmugha Naicker, 436/4, Kelambakkam Main Road, Kolappakkam Village and Post, Via Vandalur, Chennai 600 127.
..Plaintiff
-Versus-
1.M/s.Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Territory Manager, No.35, Vaidyanathan Street, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081.
2.L.Ramachandran
Prop. M/s.Ramachandra Agencies (BPCL), 1/524, G.S.T.Road, Vandalur, Chennai-600 048. ..Defendants
A.No.488 of 2019:
M/s.Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Territory Manager, No.35, Vaidyanathan Street, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081. ..Applicant/1st Defendant
-Versus-
1.S.Udhyashankar S/o.Shanmugha Naicker, 436/4, Kelambakkam Main Road, Kolappakkam Village and Post, Via Vandalur, Chennai 600 127. ..Respondent/Plaintiff
2.L.Ramachandran
Prop. M/s.Ramachandra Agencies (BPCL), 1/524, G.S.T.Road, Vandalur, Chennai-600 048. ..Respondent/2nd Defendant
2
Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to condone the delay of 89 days and accept Written Statement to the file.
This Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing, the Court made the following order:
This application is filed seeking to condone the delay
of 89 days and accept the written statement to the file.
applicant/1st defendant and the respondents.
days delay in filing the written statement.
application reveals that the 1st defendant and the
plaintiff were in the course of settling the dispute through Mediation, but the attempt did not fructify. Hence,
there was a delay in filing the written statement within 30 days from the date of receipt of suit summon.
5.The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff/1st
respondent would also fairly concede that the talk for settlement broke, since there was no agreement regarding
quantum of damages. However, the land leased out was handed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
over to the plaintiff/1st respondent.
3
the written statement is condoned. Written statement is taken on record.
Sd./-G.J.J
06/02/2020
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2020.
JJ 17/02/2020 COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of
the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the written statement should be condoned.
M/s. Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
S. Udhyashankar
L. Ramachandran
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
