G Kamalamma v. P Francis
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a condonation of delay application as abated against one respondent due to failure to bring legal heirs on record and dismissed the application against other respondents as relief was already given up.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as abated against the first respondent and dismissed for the rest.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION)
TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
A. No.3730 of 2012
in
O.P.No.310 of 1998
In the matter of Succession Act
19 of 1925
and
In the matter of Last Will and
Testament of T.Devasahayam
(deceased)
T.Francis
No.3, Periyathambi Street,
Royapuram,
Chennai-600 013. ..Petitioner
-Vs-
1. D.Rajayaa,
No.25, Flag Staff Street,
Royapuram,
Chennai-600 013.
2. D.Chelliah,
No.3, D.G.Garden, 8 th Street,
S.N.Chetty Street,
Royapuram,
Chennai-600 013.
3. Mrs.Jasmine Philips,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ No.G.M.pet 1 st Lane,
Royapuram,
Chennai-600 013. ..Respondents
2
A.No.3730 of 2012:
1.G.Kamalamma,
Wife of Late Solomon Gunarathinam, No.3, Ambedkar Street, Chennai-600 011
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing an application to set aside an order of dismissal in OA No.1563 of 2005 should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Francis / G.Kamalamma / J.Juliet / S.Gracy / G.E.Thamburaj / P.Rathinammal / P.Vincent / Mrs.P.Premeela
Coram
N. Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court