Leave to sue against a defendant abroad was granted because the underlying memorandum of understanding was executed within the court's jurisdiction. Suit registered.
Leave to sue against the second defendant was granted; suit to be numbered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2421 of 2020 in C.S.SR.No.64961 of 2020
A.No.2421 of 2020
in C.S.SR.No.64961 of 2020
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J,
The suit had been filed for recovery of money based on
Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.03.2019 between the plaintiff and
the defendants. The 1st defendant, under the said Memorandum of Understanding had agreed to supply Electrical Meters to the plaintiff, upon
the plaintiff paying necessary consideration for the same. The suit had been
filed in view of non-supply of such materials.
2.The 2nd defendant which is the parent company of the 1st defendant
is at Singapore and consequently leave is sought.
3.It is stated by the learned counsel that the Memorandum of
Understanding which is basis for the claim was executed at Chennai, within
the jurisdiction of this Court.
1/2
A.No.2421 of 2020 in C.S.SR.No.64961 of 2020
smv
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.,J
4.In view of that fact, leave is granted and the Application is ordered
as prayed for.
5.Registry may number the suit, if it is otherwise in order.
15.10.2020
smv
A.No.2421 of 2020
in
C.S.SR.No.64961 of 2020
2/2
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
