This order condones a 700-day delay in filing a written statement in a partition suit. The court allowed the condonation, reasoning that the nature of averments required sufficient particulars to be provided to both sides.
Condonoation of a delay of 700 days in filing the written statement was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2293 of 2020 in C.S.No.606 of 2018
A.No.2293 of 2020 in
C.S.No.606 of 2018 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
This application has been filed to condone the delay of 700 days in filing the written statement.
2.The learned counsel
appearing for the respondents objected this petition on the ground that the sufficient reasons have not been given to condone the delay of 700 days.
3.The suit has been filed for partition, declaration, permanent injunction and other reliefs.
4.Having regard to the nature of averments and in order to give sufficient particulars to both sides the delay condoned.
05.10.2020
mtl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 700 days in filing the written statement can be condoned upon sufficient particulars being provided.
Whether the nature of averments in the suit necessitated the refusal to condone the delay to give sufficient particulars to both sides.
N.Sathish Kumar
Unnamed Respondents
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
