Disposed

M.Kaladevi v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC25 Apr 2019WP(MD)/9967/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court directed respondents to survey petitioner's property in Thiruparankundram and issue patta within eight weeks if no opposition exists, allowing police assistance against baseless resistance or directing Civil Court otherwise.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to complete survey within eight weeks; police assistance allowed against baseless opposition; petitioner to approach Civil Court in case of resistance.

M.Kaladevi Vs the Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.04.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

WP(MD)No.9967 of 2019

M.Kaladevi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk Office, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶10

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Thiruparankundram Taluk Office, Madurai District, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents Nos.1 and 2 to survey the petitioners property in old survey No.167/6, New survey No.167/6A for an extent of 1300 sq.ft situated at Thanakkankulam Village, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Madurai District and issue patta in his favour on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 08.03.2019.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Palani

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan,

¶14

Government Advocate

¶15

ORDER

¶16

By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶17

2.The petitioner wants the petition mentioned lands to be surveyed and measured. The respondents are directed to conclude the survey exercise. If the respondents encounter any resistance or opposition, they shall relegate the writ petitioner to move the jurisdictional Civil Court. If there is no resistance or opposition, the survey exercise should be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the opposition is without any basis, the survey authorities are at https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ liberty to take the assistance of the jurisdictional police.

¶18

¶19

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CRL SIDE) // True Copy //

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar()

¶22

Skm

¶23

¶24

1.The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk Office, Madurai District,Madurai.

¶25

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Thiruparankundram Taluk, Thiruparankundram Taluk Office, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶26

+1. C.C. To Mr.M.Palani Advocate SR.No.62399

¶27

+1. C.C. To Special Government Pleader SR.No.62890

¶28

WP(MD)No.9967 of 2019

¶29

TK/SAR- /17.05.2019/2P/5C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Kaladevi v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Kaladevi v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeyaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Mohammed Rafi Vs the Inspector of Police

Sundaravel Ramesh Vs the Passport Officer

Sangili Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramajayam Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Saravanan Vs the District Collector