Allowed

Gurumoorthi Kamaraj, v. the Deputy General Manager

Madras HC7 Mar 2019WP(MD)/8271/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a writ petition filed by a società petitioner seeking a commissioning letter for an LPG distributorship under the S.C. Category in Ramanathapuram District. The Court directed the respondents to issue the Letter of Appointment within two weeks, distinguishing the current matter from a related status quo order concerning an open category application.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to issue the Letter of Appointment (L.O.A.) to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Gurumoorthi Kamaraj, Vs the Deputy General Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.03.2019 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.8271 of 2018

¶4

Gurumoorthi Kamaraj ... Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The Deputy General Manager (LPG-S),

¶7

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Marketing Division, Southern Region, Indian Oil Bhavan, No.139, Mahatma Gandhi Road, (Nungambakkam High Road),

¶8

Chennai.

¶9

The Chief Area Manager(LPG-S),

¶10

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,

¶11

Indane Area Office,

¶12

No.2, Race Course Road,

¶13

Chokkikulam, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to issue Commissioning letter to the petitioner to run LPG distributorship under S.C. Category in Ramanathapuram District by considering his representation dated 29.09.2017.

¶15

For Petitioner : Shri.Parthasarathy Senior counsel for M/s.R.Gandhi

¶16

For Respondents : Shri.Parthasarathy, for Mr.K.Muraleedharan ***

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Writ petitioner and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶19

The Writ petitioner submitted an application dated 22.10.2013 for appointing her as an L.P.G. Distributor. The petitioner applied under the S.C. category for an area in Ramanathapuram District. The respondent Corporation passed an order dated 08.08.2016 awarding the distributorship in favour of the Writ petitioner. But then, commissioning letter was not issued https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to the Writ petitioner. Therefore, the Writ petitioner was constrained to file this Writ petition.

¶20

¶21

When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was submitted that in view of the Status Quo order granted in W.P.(MD) No.17150 of 2016, the petitioner has not been issued commissioning letter till date.

¶22

I went through the order dated 09.09.2016 made in W.M.P. (MD)Nos.12435 and 12436 of 2016 in W.P.(MD) No.17150 of 2016. It is seen that the applicant therein sought awarding of L.P.G. Distributorship only under the open category. The outcome of W.P. (MD)No.17150 of 2016 will not have any bearing on the Writ petitioner's rights. Therefore, the respondents need not feel discouraged by the order granting Status Quo in the other Writ petition filed by Thiru.S.Rajesh Kanna. Therefore, the respondents are directed to issue Letter of Appointment(L.O.A.) to the Writ petitioner to run the Distributorship. Such a letter will be issued within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the fulfillment of all other formalities.

¶23

The Writ petition stands allowed, accordingly. No costs.

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

The Deputy General Manager (LPG-S), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Marketing Division, Southern Region, Indian Oil Bhavan, No.139, Mahatma Gandhi Road, (Nungambakkam High Road), Chennai.

¶28

The Chief Area Manager(LPG-S), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Indane Area Office, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ No.2, Race Course Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai.

¶29

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.R.GANDHI, Advocate ( SR-52568[F] dated 08/03/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.K.MURALEEDHARAN, Advocate ( SR-52785[F] dated 08/03/2019 )

¶31

PMU

¶32

W.P.(MD)No.8271 of 2018 07.03.2019

¶33

KM/(13.03.2019) 3P 5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gurumoorthi Kamaraj, v. the Deputy General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurumoorthi Kamaraj, v. the Deputy General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvi Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Paramaguru, Vs the Principal

Sathyamoorthy, Vs the Assistant Director of

Issakithurai Vs the Inspector of Police

Babu Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Veerapandi Athipathi, Vs the Director