The writ petition filed under Article 226 for quashing an order was closed as infructuous based on counsel's submission and endorsement that the impugned order had already been acted upon. Connected petitions were also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.7960 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.(MD)No.7960 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 and 2 of 2011
A.Selvaraj ... Petitioner
/Vs./
Madurai District @ Madurai.
Madurai District. ... Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records from the 1st respondent, in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.587/2011/ A2 dated 08.07.2011 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Ms.J.Saranya for Mr.N.Sathish Babu
For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu Additional Government Pleader For R-3 : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss
ORDER
It is submitted by Ms.J.Saranya, learned counsel for writ petitioner that instant writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file in this regard.
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.7960 of 2011
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
sm
To
Madurai District @ Madurai.
Madurai District.
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.7960 of 2011 Dated: 13.11.2019
JMN(02.12.2019) 2P : 4C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Selvaraj
The District Collector
The Assistant Director (Village Panchayats)
The Block Development Officer
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
