Dismissed

K.Sundaram, v. the District Collector

Madras HC23 Apr 2019WP(MD)/7854/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed writ under Article 226 seeking direction to second respondent to dispose of a revision preferred by fifth respondent. Court noted revision was already disposed in fifth respondent's favour, rendering petition infructuous, but granted liberty to challenge that order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to challenge the order dated 16.12.2015 passed in the Revision Application.

K.Sundaram, Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 23.04.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD).No.7854 of 2019

K.Sundaram

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The District Collector, District Collector's Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶10

2.The District Revenue Officer, D.R.O. Office, District Collector's Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶11

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, R.D.O Office, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

¶12

4.The Tahsildar,

¶13

Taluk office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

¶14

5.A.Sebastin

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to dispose the main revision (Na.Ka.C2/1628/2015), which has been preferred by the fifth respondent herein dated on 08.01.2015. within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar

¶18

For R-1 to R-4 : Mrs.VPH.Vaishavi

¶19

Additional Government Pleader

¶20

For R-5 : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The instant writ petition has been filed filed for a Mandamus https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to direct the second respondent to dispose of the main revision

¶23

¶24

(Na.Ka.C2/1628/2015), which was preferred by the fifth respondent on 08.01.2015, within a stipulated period fixed by this Court.

¶25

2 . Heard Mr.R.Sundar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.VPH.Vaishnavi, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent.

¶26

3 . Today, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent that the Revision Application has already been disposed of by an order dated 16.12.2015 in favour of the fifth respondent and nine others.

¶27

4 . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the said order dated 16.12.2015 passed in the Revision Application has not been served upon the petitioner and he seeks liberty of this Court to challenge the order dated 16.12.2015.

¶28

5 . In view of the same, the Writ Petition has now become infructuous. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the order dated 16.12.2015 passed in the Revision Application preferred by the fifth respondent before the second respondent in accordance with law.

¶29

6 . In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶30

Assistant Registrar (ADI)

¶31

// True Copy //

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶33

¶34

1.The District Collector, District Collector's Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶35

2.The District Revenue Officer,

¶36

D.R.O. Office, District Collector's Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶37

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ R.D.O Office, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

¶38

¶39

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

¶40

+1 CC to M/s.N.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-61875[F] dated 23/04/2019 )

¶41

+1 CC to M/s.R.SUNDAR, Advocate ( SR-61880[F] dated 23/04/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-62716[F] dated 25/04/2019 )

¶42

TSG

¶43

Order made in W.P.(MD).No.7854 of 2019 23.04.2019

¶44

KM/(07.05.2019) 3P 8C

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Sundaram, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sundaram, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Crafts India, Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

M/S.Aara Silks, Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

G.Sundar Raj Vs the Regional Transport Officer

Tvl Jai Narayana Paper & Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Mrs. Thangaamal, Vs the District Collector

M/S Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Union of India, Rep. by