2. The fifth respondent has filed a counter affidavit contending that the petitioner is not a geniune public interest litigant and there is a dispute between the petitioner's son and the fifth respondent and in this regard, a criminal case is also pending. Further, it is seen that the fifth respondent has obtained necessary permission from the Pollution Control Board in the year 2017 and there are communications between the fifth respondent and the District Collector, Sub Collector and Tahsildar and the Executive Engineer and the fifth respondent, which clearly show that the allegations made by the petitioner against the fifth respondent are far from truth. Furthermore, it is not the case of the petitioner how the fifth respondent is violating the approval conditions.