Disposed

R.Velvadivu v. the Chairman

Madras HC29 Jul 2019WP(MD)/6097/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to be included in the 2012 seniority list for sewing teachers under the Land Losers category. The Court declined to direct appointment due to the passage of time, observing that the petitioner's case must be considered under rules now in force.

What did the court decide?

No direction for appointment or inclusion in the seniority list was issued; the petitioner is to be considered under current rules if eligible.

R.Velvadivu Vs the Chairman — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.6097/2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 29.07.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.6097 of 2012 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2012

R.Velvadivu

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Chairman,

Teachers Recruitment Board,

¶11

College Road,

¶12

Chennai-6.

¶13

2.The Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai.

¶14

3.The District Employment Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to include the petitioner's name in the statewide seniority list for the post of sewing teachers notified by the teacher recruitment board in 2012 and to appoint her to the post of sewing teacher.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabhu For R1 : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, Special Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.D.Muruganandham, Additional Government Pleader

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to include the petitioner's name in the statewide seniority list for appointment to the post of sewing teachers notified by the Teachers Recruitment Board in 2012 and to appoint her.

¶19

2.The petitioner claims that the properties belonging to the family of the writ petitioner was acquired and accordingly a certificate of priority was issued by the competent authority for the purpose of securing employment under the Land Losers category.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/4

¶22

W.P(MD)No.6097/2012

¶23

3.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner states that though the recruitment notification was issued in the year 2012, the case of the writ petitioner was not considered. However, at this length of time, the appointment cannot be issued, by way of a direction, by this Court. However, the writ petitioner is to be considered under the land losers category, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible and as per the Government Orders and the rules in force.

¶24

4.With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that the case of the writ petitioner is to be considered with reference to the rules now in force and as per her eligibility and as per the terms and conditions applicable to the land losers priority category. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

// True Copy //

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶29

¶30

1.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai-6.

¶31

2.The Director of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai.

¶32

3.The District Employment Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar District.

¶33

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-78526[F] dated 30/07/2019 )

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.K.PRABHU, Advocate ( SR-78690[F] dated 30/07/2019 )

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.6097 of 2012 29.07.2019

¶36

KK/SAR/08.08.2019/2P-6C/

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

2/4

R.Velvadivu v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Velvadivu v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Muniammal, Vs the Director of Elementary

M.Panneer, Vs the Chairman

C.S. Shanthi, Vs the President

K. Jayaraman, Vs the Tamil Nadu Kadhi

R.Balasubramanian, Vs the District Elementary-

Mr.R. Ramaiah, Vs the Director of School