Disposed

P.Nagendran, S/O.Paluchamy, v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC4 Mar 2019WP(MD)/3812/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a mandate directing revenue authorities to survey boundaries for the petitioner's ancestral property. The Madurai bench held the Tahsildar competent and directed disposal of the representation within three months.

What did the court decide?

The respondent Tahsildar is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.01.2019 within three months.

P.Nagendran, S/O.Paluchamy, Vs the District Revenue Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.03.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.3812 of 2019

¶6

P.Negendran ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Madurai. 2. The Sub Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶9

The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk Office, Thiruparankundram, Madurai District.

¶10

The Assistant Director of Land Surveys, Collectorate, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to furnish Land Survey Register maintained under the land survey schemes like Old Settlement, Resettlement and Updating scheme in respect of Resurvey No.15/10 of Perungudi Revenue Village, Thiruparankundram Taluk and subsequently respondents be directed to ad-measure and fix the boundaries to the survey No.15/10 in the land stands in the name of the petitioner's father Paluchamy by considering the representation dated 05.01.2019.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman, Special Government Pleader.

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶14

The Writ petitioner has given a representation dated 05.01.2019 for survey and measurement of the petition mentioned property. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

¶16

The third respondent is the authority competent to consider the same. The third respondent is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 05.01.2019 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

This Writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly.

¶18

At this juncture, the learned Special Government Pleader states that the petitioner must be directed to give a fresh application. The learned counsel appearing for the Writ petitioner states that along with this order copy, the petitioner would submit a fresh application.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy //

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

pmu

¶23

¶24

The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Madurai.

¶25

The Sub Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶26

The Tahsildar, Thiruparankundram Taluk Office, Thiruparankundram, Madurai District.

¶27

The Assistant Director of Land Surveys, Collectorate, Madurai.

¶28

+1CC TO MR.K.K.SAMY, Advocate Sr. No. 51574

¶29

+1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.No. 51694

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.3812 of 2019 04.03.2019

¶31

TR (28.03.2019) 2P 7C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Nagendran, S/O.Paluchamy, v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Nagendran, S/O.Paluchamy, v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ulagamuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Sri Malaiyamman Manal Vs the District Collector

Icici Bank Staff Co-Operative Vs Government of India, Ministry

G.Sasikala, Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by

A.M.S.Saravanan, Vs the District Collector

P.Periyasamy, Vs the Executive Engineer