Allowed

K.Krishnan v. the Managing Director

Madras HC20 Feb 2019WP(MD)/23172/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.12.2017 regarding promotion on merits and in accordance with law within eight weeks, after affording a hearing opportunity, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.12.2017 on merits within eight weeks, after hearing.

K.Krishnan Vs the Managing Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.02.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

WP(MD)No.23172 of 2017

K.Krishnan

... Petitioner

/Vs./

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Ltd., Bye – pass Road, Madurai District.

¶11

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Ltd., Bye – pass Road, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.12.2017 within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.A.Jeyaram

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.12.2017.

¶16

According to the petitioner, the representation dated 08.12.2017 given by him seeking promotion has not been considered by the respondents. Seeking appropriate directions, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that the representation of the petitioner would be considered on merits and in accordance with law, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶18

Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for by https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner in this writ petition, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to

¶19

¶20

consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.12.2017, on merits and in accordance with law and pass necessary orders, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (Crl.side)

¶24

/True Copy/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Ltd., Bye – pass Road, Madurai District.

¶28

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Ltd., Bye – pass Road, Madurai District.

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.K.GOKUL, Advocate ( SR-48805[F] dated 21/02/2019 )

¶30

¶31

TE : 25/03/2019 : 2P/4C

¶32

ORDER MADE IN WP(MD)No.23172 of 2017 20.02.2019

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Krishnan v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Krishnan v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mahadevan, S/O.Manivel Vs the Chief Educational Officer

Parameshwari Vs the Secretary to the

C.Sasikala Vs the Managing Director

A.Lakshmi, Vs the Principal Account General

Padmavathi, W/O.Jeyamurugan Vs the Forest Ranger &

R.Krishnanalluamy Vs the Principal Accountant