Allowed

K.Chandrasekaran v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC3 Oct 2019WP(MD)/21207/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider representations regarding Patta issuance. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition, with rights reserved for a fresh petition based on specific annexures.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition, with rights reserved to file a fresh petition annexing relevant papers.

K.Chandrasekaran Vs the Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.21207 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.10.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P(MD)No.21207 of 2019

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)No.17849 of 2019

K.Chandrasekaran

... Petitioner

vs.

The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar Office, Karur, Karur District. ... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 02.01.2018 and 06.08.2018 and pass appropriate orders within the time stipulated by this Court for issuance of separate Patta in respect of Ayan Punja land in Survey No.470 to an extent of 1 acre ½ cent situated at Velliyanai Village, Karur District in the light of Judgment dated 25.10.2017 passed in S.A(MD)No.958 of 2014 on the file of this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vashik Ali for Mr.D.Nallathambi

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu, Additional Government Pleader.

¶15

ORDER

¶16

After some arguments, learned counsel for writ petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the instant Writ Petition, but made a plea that rights of writ petitioner may please be preserved to file a fresh writ petition by annexing relevant papers which according to writ petitioner constitute crux of the instant Writ Petition. To be noted, there is also variance between prayer contained in Writ Petition and in affidavit.

¶17

2.Permitted to withdraw.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P(MD)No.21207 of 2019

¶21

3.Instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn albeit preserving the rights of writ petitioner in the aforesaid manner. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

// True Copy //

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

¶28

The Tahsildar, O/o.The Tahsildar Office, Karur, Karur District.

¶29

+1CC TO MR.D.NALLATHAMBI, Advocate Sr. No.91414

¶30

W.P(MD)No.21207 of 2019 03.10.2019

¶31

DB(CO) TR(21.10.2019) 2P 3C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

K.Chandrasekaran v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Chandrasekaran v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Selvaraj, S/O.Karuppiah, Vs the District Collector

N.R.S.K.Pandian Vs The Secretary to Govt

R.Chandramohan, Vs the Food Safety Officer

Perumal, Vs the District Collector

M. Sorna Ganesh Vs the District Revenue Officer

Manoharan Vs The District Revenue Officer