Disposed

K.Sasikumar v. the District Magistrate/

Madras HC4 Nov 2019WP(MD)/19559/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition directed the District Collector to dispose of an application under Cr.P.C. regarding an alleged encroachment. The court found that the encroachment was partially removed and a civil suit with a temporary injunction was pending. It directed the Collector to maintain the relieved position pending the civil suit.

What did the court decide?

Allowed to maintain the relieved extent of 4.50 sq. meters removed; parties left to adjudicate rights before the civil Court.

K.Sasikumar Vs the District Magistrate/ — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.19559 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.11.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI

¶5

W.P(MD)No.19559 of 2019

K.Sasikumar

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Magistrate / District Collector, Office of the District Collector,

¶10

Karur, Karur District.

¶11

2.Balu @ Balakrishnan .. Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent / District Magistrate to dispose of the petitioner under Section 133(I)(a)(I) Cr.P.C., dated 10.10.2018 and 02.04.2019 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.J.Chakkaravarthy For R1 : Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.K.Hariharan

¶14

ORDER

¶15

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶16

Heard Mr.S.J.Chakkaravarthy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the first respondent and Mr.K.Hariharan, learned counsel for the second respondent. By consent on either side, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶17

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction upon the first respondent to dispose of his application filed under Section 133 Cr.P.C., and abate the nuisance caused by the second respondent by fencing a common pathway. On a perusal of the photographs, we find that there are stone pillars adjacent to the third respondent's house and according to the petitioner it is an encroachment of a pathway.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P(MD)No.19559 of 2019

¶21

The Revenue Thasildar, Aravakurichi Taluk has given written instructions to the learned Special Government Pleader, dated 12.10.2019 stating that the encroachment has been removed to the extent of 4.50 square meters and photographs have also been produced. In the meantime, the second respondent has filed a suit in O.S.No.765 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Karur and obtained an order of temporary injunction in I.A.No.873 of 2019. In the said suit, the petitioner is the defendant.

¶22

In the light of the above, the extent of encroachment removed as of now, shall be maintained as such and no further encroachment shall be made and the parties are left to adjudicate their rights before the civil Court.

¶23

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶26

¶27

¶28

The District Magistrate / District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Karur, Karur District.

¶29

+1 CC to SPL GP SR-96092.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.S.J.CHAKKKARAVARTHY, Advocate SR-96198.

¶31

W.P(MD)No.19559 of 2019 04.11.2019

¶32

CS(13.11.2019) 2P 4C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

2/2

K.Sasikumar v. the District Magistrate/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sasikumar v. the District Magistrate/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Palanichamy Vs the Special Officer

The Commissioner of Customs Vs M/S.Vishaal Bricks

The Commissioner of Customs Vs M/S.Naga Ltd.

Srinivasa Enterprises, Vs the Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Thangaiya Vs M.Subramanian

K.Subbaiah Vs the District Collector