P.Sumathi, v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a writ petition wherein the petitioner complained of non-payment of application selling commission. The Court noted an enquiry had been conducted and the amount remitted, rendering the petition closed with no costs.
What did the court decide?
No costs. The writ petition stands closed and the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
WP(MD)No. 16876 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.12244 of 2016
P.Sumathi
... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Commissioner, Directorate of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai.
- Anbukarasi ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take disciplinary action on the second respondent as requested in the petitioner's representation dated 03.08.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.Chamundi Bose For Respondents : Mr. V.Anand, No.1 Government Advocate No.2 No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Sumathi
- respondent
The Commissioner, Directorate of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai.
- respondent
Anbukarasi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court