Allowed

M.Siva v. The District Collector

Madras HC26 Jul 2019WP(MD)/16690/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the release of a bullock cart seized for alleged illegal sand mining, allowing the owner to prove ownership during ongoing inquiries while enforcing duties to complete adjudication within 45 days.

What did the court decide?

Directed the third respondent to release the seized bullock cart forthwith subject to undertaking regarding ownership and cooperation, and directed authorities to finalize orders within 45 days.

M.Siva Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 26.07.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

W.P(MD)No.16690 of 2019

¶7

M.Siva ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Ayyampettai Police Station, Thanjavur District. 4.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mines, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the bullock cart seized on 27.04.2019 by the third respondent, to the petitioner.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.AN.Ramanathan, For Respondents : Mrs.J.Padmavathy Devi, Special Government Pleader.

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The petitioner is the owner of a bullock-cart and states that he is using the bullock-cart for agricultural purposes. He also states that he ekes his livelihood wholly from the income derived from the said vehicle. On 27.04.2019, the bullock-cart was seized https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ by the third respondent on the ground that it was transporting sand without a valid license. The vehicle is presently in the

¶13

¶14

custody of the third respondent.

¶15

2. According to the petitioner, the above allegation is incorrect and his stand will be vindicated in the course of enquiry, that is, according to the learned Additional Government Pleader, who appears for all the respondents, presently on-going.

¶16

3. It is represented that a case in Crime No.84 of 2019 has been registered by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ayyampettai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶17

4. Pending enquiry, I am of the view that the vehicle should be handed back to the possession of the petitioner as he states that he is using the same for agricultural purposes and also for the reason that the respondents are not in a position to protect the same against the onslaught of the elements.

¶18

5. The third respondent is directed to release the vehicle

¶19

forthwith and in any event within a period of one week from today strictly subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions:-

¶20

i. The petitioner is directed to file an affidavit of undertaking within three days from today to the effect that he is the owner of the vehicle, he will cause production of the vehicle in question before the competent/concerned respondent (as the case may be) as and when called for and that he will not alienate the vehicle in question till the enquiry initiated is completed;

¶21

ii.The petitioner is directed to co-operate in the enquiry to the fullest.

¶22

iii.The fourth respondent/Assistant Director and Revenue Divisional Officer are directed to pass final orders in the adjudication proceedings, if any, within a period of forty five (45) days from today.

¶23

6. A Division Bench of this Court has, on 29.10.2018 issued a series of detailed directions to the concerned authorities targeted at containing illegal sand mining as well as measures to address and prevent such acts. The same are extracted hereunder:-

¶24

“ (i)The District Level Task Forces and Taluk Level Task Forces, constituted pursuant to the order passed in WP(MD)No.9806 of 2018 should follow the G.O.(Ms)No.135 Industries (MMA.1) Department, dated 13.11.2009 in letter and spirit.

¶25

(ii)As stated in the above said Government Order, periodical meetings will have to be held which is inclusive of action taken/to be taken for the illicit https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ mining.

¶26

(iii)Steps will have to be taken for dereliction of

¶27

¶28

the duty by the concerned officials.

¶29

(iv)Taluk Level Task Forces shall also comply with the directions issued in the Government Order by making frequent surprise checks and submit their report to the District Level Task Forces.

¶30

(v)The Taluk Level Task Forces shall meet every fortnight as mandated in the Government Order.

¶31

(vi)The responsibility fixed in the Government Order will have to be strictly construed and action will have to be taken against the erring Village Administrative Officer, Tahsildar, Officer in-charge of Department of Geology and Mining at District Level.

¶32

(vii)Action taken report will have to be sent by the District Collector concerned for the purpose of taking necessary action. The District Collector concerned shall take appropriate departmental action by himself as per the Rules provided so.

¶33

(viii)Separate records will have to be maintained by the Village Administrative Officer, Tahsildar and Officer in-charge of the Department of Geology and Mining with respect to the cases involving illicit mining.

¶34

(ix)As and when illicit mining is reported, the same will be recorded in the records.

¶35

(x)The respective District Collectors will have to ensure by making vide publicity of phone particulars assigned to the District Level Task Forces and the Talk Level Task Forces, so that, the general public can give their complaints. There should be affixture or display of the phone particulars in the Collectorate, Taluk office, Office of Deputy Director and Assistant Director of Geology and Mining and that of the Village Administrative Officer.

¶36

(xi)Complainant will have to be intimated on the action taken within a period of one week from the date of receipt of the complaint. A complaint shall also be received even when made through phone calls.

¶37

(xii)Complaints by an authorised person under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 are to be made immediately and not later than one week from the date of seizure.

¶38

(xiii)Whenever, a final report is filed for the offence under Section 379 IPC by the jurisdictional police before the jurisdictional Magistrate, the same shall also be committed to the Special Court. This is for the reason that it would be appropriate to deal with both the police case and the private complaint by the same Court and in order to avoid any possible conflict.

¶39

(xiv)The revenue officials at the time of seizure can https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ issue a memo to the person in-charge of the vehicle, mineral among other things, indicating the seizure made, along with the date and time.

¶40

¶41

(xv)In so far as the seized vehicles are concerned, they shall be produced before the concerned Magistrate Court by the revenue authorities at the time of filing their respective complaints.

¶42

(xvi)Any application for release of vehicle etc., can only be filed before the Special Court alone.

¶43

(xvii)Any violation of the above would constitute a contempt of the order passed by this Court, for which, appropriate application can either be filed before the First Bench of this Court or any other Bench as per the direction of the Hon'ble Chief Justice.”

¶44

7. The above directions shall be followed scrupulously by the concerned officials.

¶45

8. This Writ Petition is disposed in the above terms. No

¶46

costs.

¶47

Assistant Registrar (C.O)

¶48

// True Copy //

¶49

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶50

¶51

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶52

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶53

3.The Inspector of Police, Ayyampettai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

¶54

4.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mines, Thanjavur District.

¶55

+1 CC to Mr.AN.RAMANATHAN, Advocate SR-78195. +1 CC to SPL GP SR-78248.

¶56

W.P(MD)No.16690 of 2019

¶57

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CS(06.08.2019) 4P 7C

M.Siva v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Siva v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Kottai Veeran, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M/S Vasan Feeds, Vs the Commissioner

C.Chellatha, Vs the District Collector

K.Seenivasan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Sutha Vs The Assistant Director

V.Lakshmana Pandian Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer