Dismissed

The Manager/Correspondent v. the Chief Educational Officer

Madras HC15 Oct 2019WP(MD)/13236/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as infructuous, accepting the petitioner's counsel's submission that the underlying dispute had been resolved, thereby closing connected miscellaneous petitions without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

The Manager/Correspondent Vs the Chief Educational… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2009

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.10.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2009 and W.M.P(MD).Nos.1, 2, 3 and 4 of 2019

¶3

The Manager/Correspondent IQBALIA Middle School, The Executive Officer of Batlagundu Tholugai Pallivasal/ The Superintendent of Wakf's South Zone, Madurai, No.1, Town Hall Road, 2^nd Floor, Pallivasal Compex, Madurai-1. ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, District Educational Office, Dindigul. 3.The Assistant Educational Officer, Assistant Educational Office, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. 4.The Thasildar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 6.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7.K.S.M.A.Mohamed Mansoor ... Respondents

¶4

1/3

¶5

W.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2009

¶6

PRAYER :- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in connection with the order passed by the respondents 1 and 2 dated 12.12.2009 in Na.Ka.No.9341/B2/2009 and Na.Ka.No.3766/A3/2009 respectively and quash the same.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Pandi for Mr.K.K.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.M.Karuppasamy (for R1 to R3) Government Advocate Mr.K.Mu.Muthu (for R4 to R6) Additional Government Pleader Ms.M.D.Devisaravanapriya for Mr.P.T.S.Narendravasan (for R7)

¶8

ORDER

¶9

Mr.V.Pandi, learned counsel representing counsel on record for writ petitioner submits that instant writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel has made an endorsement to this effect in the case file.

¶10

Endorsement is reiterated in the hearing.

¶11

In the light of the narrative thus far, instant Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶12

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶13

rmk

¶14

¶15

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

¶16

2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, District Educational Office, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Dindigul.

¶17

2/3

¶18

W.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2009

¶19

3.The Assistant Educational Officer, Assistant Educational Office, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. 4.The Thasildar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 6.The Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Police Station, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-92504,95208[F] dated 17/10/2019 ) Order made in W.P.(MD)No.13236 of 2009 Dated: 15.10.2019 KM/(25.10.2019) 3P 8C

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

3/3

The Manager/Correspondent v. the Chief Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Manager/Correspondent v. the Chief Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandran, S/O. Krishna Thevar, Vs the Special Deputy Collector

Ambika Woods Pvt.,Ltd., Vs the District Collector

Dowlath Beevi Vs the District Collector

Mohamed Ibrahim Sait Vs the Deputy Director

M.Murugan, S/O.Madasamy, Vs the Superintending Engineer

A.Muthammal Vs The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager