The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court held that a writ petition declaring documents infructuous is closed as infructuous based on an endorsement in the case file. No costs awarded.
Writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.12428 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.(MD)No.12428 of 2009 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6049 of 2019
Annathana Chathiram, Represented by its Thakkar, Seevalaperi Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
... Petitioner
/Vs./
1.The Sub-Registrar, Barkitmanagaram, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Sub-Registrar, Melaneezhithanallur, Tirunelveli District.
3.M.D.K.Thirumalaiyappan 4.M.D.K.Shanmuganathan
5.M.D.K.Subramanian
6.M.D.K.Kumarasamy
7.M.D.T.Renganathan
8.D.T.Ramsamy
... Respondents
[R-3 to R-8 impleaded as party respondents as per order of this Court dated 07.09.2010 in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2009 in W.P.(MD)No.12428 of 2009]
PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent not to entertain or register any document in respect of lands in S.Nos.101 to 105, 108 to 115, 117 to 121, 124, 128, 130 to 142, 144 to 180, 183 to 186, 188 to 193, 196, 197, 199 to 203, 207 to 219, 221 to 224, 226 to 232, 234 to 249, 251 to 265, 267 to 277, 279, 280, 287 to 293, 296 to 299, 327, 331, 334 to 337, 395 to 397, 400 to 404, 406 to 416, 419 to 424, 427 to 432, 435 to 439, 441 to 448, 450 to 453, 455, 456, 458, 460, 462 to 466, 468 to 471, 473, 475 to 480, 487, 488, 491, 492, 494 under patta no. 87 in Ariyakulam Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelvlei District and S.Nos.30/1 and 3, 32, 33, 34/1, 35, 36, 37/1A, 38 and 39 at Theivacheyalpuram https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
W.P.(MD)No.12428 of 2009
Village, Tuticorin District without obtaining “No Objection Certificate” from the Chathiram.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate For R-3 : Mr.M.R.S.Prabhu For R-4 to R-8 : Mr.V.R.Shamuganathan
ORDER
It is submitted by learned counsel for writ petitioner that instant writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file in this regard.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CO)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Sub-Registrar, Barkitmanagaram, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Sub-Registrar, Melaneezhithanallur, Tirunelveli District.
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.12428 of 2009 Dated:30.10.2019
sm
MS/13-11-2019/2P.3C
2/2
Annathana Chathiram
The Sub-Registrar, Barkitmanagaram
The Sub-Registrar, Melaneezhithanallur
M.D.K.Thirumalaiyappan
M.D.K.Shanmuganathan
M.D.K.Subramanian
M.Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
