Dismissed

Siluvai, S/O. Jorris, v. the District Collector

Madras HC24 Oct 2019WP(MD)/10490/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order deals with W.P(MD)No.10490 of 2010 and connected M.P(MD)No.1 of 2010 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court found no representation from the petitioner and regulated counsel to that effect. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.

Siluvai, S/O. Jorris, Vs the District Collector — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.10490 of 2010

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.10.2019 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶4

W.P(MD)No.10490 of 2010 and

¶5

M.P(MD)No.1 of 2010

¶6

Siluvai ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶9

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram Thucklay, Kanyakumari District.

¶10

John Son ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to initiate appropriate action against the third respondent under the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C.R.Nirmal For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.M.Pandiarajan, Additional Government Pleader.

¶13

For R – 3 : No appearance

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of proceedings made yesterday (23.10.2019), which read as follows:

¶16

'Ms.S.Jessi Mathus Fathima, learned counsel for the third respondent (private respondent) and State counsel Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 (official respondents) are before this Court.

¶17

But, there is no representation for the writ petitioner.

¶18

List under the caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' on 24.10.2019.'

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

1/2

¶21

W.P(MD)No.10490 of 2010

¶22

2.This matter was listed today under the caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' and Mr.C.R.Nirmal, learned counsel on behalf of writ petitioner expresses regret for non-appearance in the last hearing.

¶23

3.Now, learned counsel on behalf of writ petitioner submits that he has no instructions from writ petitioner and he has also made an endorsement in this regard in the case file, which reads as follows:

¶24

'No instructions from the petitioner'.

¶25

4.In the light of the aforesaid trajectory, instant Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution by writ petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶30

¶31

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶32

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram Thucklay, Kanyakumari District.

¶33

+1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-94609[F] dated 25/10/2019 )

¶34

W.P(MD)No.10490 of 2010 24.10.2019

¶35

¶36

MK (04.11.2019) 2P 4C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

2/2

Siluvai, S/O. Jorris, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siluvai, S/O. Jorris, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Vaiyalingam Vs the Commissioner

M.Thiagarajan Vs The District Collector

Rajasekar Vs The District Collector

M.Palanisamy Gounder, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

G. Sekar Vs the District Revenue Officer

Pandi Vs The Govt. of India