Disposed

P.Dhinesh v. The Secretary to Govt

Madras HC4 Apr 2019WP/816/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition filed by candidates challenging the recruitment policy of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. The petitioners sought to enforce Rule-5 of the Tamil Nadu Transport Subordinate Service Rules. The Court directed the respondents to follow the Service Rules and Recruitment Notification strictly without ambiguity. No order as to costs was made.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to strictly implement and follow the statutory rule prescribed for selection; writ petition disposed of.

P.Dhinesh Vs The Secretary to Govt — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04-04-2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.816 of 2019 And W.M.P.Nos.903 and 905 of 2019

¶6

1.P.Dhinesh 2.B.Deepak Jothi .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (TR.II-A) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, Park Town, V.O.C. Nagar, Chennai-600 003. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the the second respondent from recruiting the candidates, who are possessing Bachelors Degree in Engineering subject without undergoing/possessing the basic qualification as prescribed under Rule-5 of he Tamil Nadu Transport Subordinate Service Rules namely Diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering (3 years Course) for selection/appointment to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector Grade-II (113 post) based on the Advertisement No.489 dated 14.2.2018 in Tamil Nadu Transport Subordinate Service (Code No.068) and consequently direct the respondents to strictly implement and follow the statutory rule prescribed for selection to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector Grade II. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Umapathi For Respondent-1 : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Special Government Pleader. For Respondent-2 : Mr.M.Loganathan, Standing Counsel for TNPSC.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to forbear the second respondent from recruiting the candidates, who are possessing Bachelors Degree in Engineering subject without undergoing/ possessing the basic qualification as prescribed under Rule-5 of he Tamil Nadu Transport Subordinate Service Rules namely Diploma in Automobile or Mechanical Engineering (3 years Course) for selection/appointment to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector Grade-II (113 post) based on the Advertisement No.489 dated 14.2.2018 in Tamil Nadu Transport Subordinate Service (Code No.068) and consequently direct the respondents to strictly implement and follow the statutory rule prescribed for selection to the post of Motor Vehicle Inspector Grade II.

¶10

The learned counsel for the writ petitioners states that the respondents are now allowing the candidates to participate in the process of selection in violation of the Rules. As per the Recruitment Notification already issued, the writ petitioners are fully qualified and are eligible to participate in the process of selection. However, the respondents are receiving the applications from some unqualified persons by prescribing the higher qualification, which is in violation of the Service Rules in force.

¶11

It is made clear that the respondents are bound to follow the Recruitment Notification strictly and scrupulously. There cannot be any violation of the Rules in force in respect of the particular post as well as the terms and conditions stipulated in the Recruitment Notification. Under these circumstances, the respondents are directed to follow the Service Rules as well as the terms and conditions stipulated in the Recruitment Notification strictly and conduct the process of selection without any room for ambiguity or allegation.

¶12

With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶13

s/dAssistant Registrar(J)

¶14

True Copy

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

¶18

1.The Secretary to Government,
Home (TR.II-A) Department,
Secretariat,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
TNPSC Road,
Park Town,
V.O.C. Nagar,
Chennai-600 003.
+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 34053.
+1 CC to Mr.M.Loganathan, Advocate sr 33123.
+1 CC to Mr.N.Umapathi, Advocate sr 32835.
W.P.No.816 of 2019
SP(25/04/2019)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Dhinesh v. The Secretary to Govt

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Dhinesh v. The Secretary to Govt

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Dhayalan,S/o.T.Raja Vs The Regional Manager

D.Packiasamu, Vs The Principal Secretary to

P.Senthamilselvan Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

M.S.Sarvanan Vs State of Tamil Nadu

J.Khaja Nijamudeen Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

P.Raju Vs Government of Tamil Nadu