Disposed

T.Suresh v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC18 Mar 2019WP/7855/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench granted interim relief by directing release of a seized lorry vehicle to the petitioner subject to specific conditions including financial deposit, personal bond, and undertaking against illegal use to prevent loss of value during custody.

What did the court decide?

Direct release of the vehicle under seven conditions: (i) deposit of Rs.50,000 non-refundable; (ii) personal bond with sureties; (iii) undertaking against illegal use; (iv) no alienation; (v) particip

T.Suresh Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.03.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶7

Writ Petition No.7855 of 2019

¶8

T.Suresh,
W/o.Thangaraj. ...Petitioner
Vs
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tiruchencode Taluk,
Namakkal District.
2. The Tahsildhar,
Paramathi Taluk,
Namakkal District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Velur Police Station,
Namakkal District. ...Respondents

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the lorry vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No.TN-52-J-6266 (Lorry Vehicle), seized by the 3^rd respondents on 10.03.2019, to the petitioner forthwith based on the representation of the petitioner dated 13.03.2019.

¶10

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the lorry vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No.TN-52-J-6266.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶13

According to the petitioner, the respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 10.03.2019 on the ground of illegal carrying of sand and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had been passed by the respondents. Hence, he has come forward with the present Writ Petition.

¶14

On the other hand, it is submitted by learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like sand and hence, the vehicle was seized. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case.

¶15

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the respondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish their value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.

¶16

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii):

¶17

(i)The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.

¶18

(ii)The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.

¶19

(iii)The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondents/authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents and also the trial Court, failing which the respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle.

¶20

(iv)The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned.

¶21

(v)The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ebsi
To
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tiruchencode Taluk,
Namakkal District.
2. The Tahsildhar,
Paramathi Taluk,
Namakkal District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Velur Police Station,
Namakkal District.
+1 cc to Mr.Deepan Uday, Advocate, S.R.No.25384
Writ Petition No.7855 of 2019
KS(CO)
SSM(23/04/2019).

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Suresh v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Suresh v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Deepak Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.Manivannan Vs The Sub Collector

S.Jayakrishnan Vs The District Revenue Officer

R.Narasingam, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.Manickam Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Tamilkumaran Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer