Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking quashing of attachment and sale notices. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.02.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No. 7538 of 2012
Binny Limited,
Represented by its Company Secretary, G.Venkataraman,
106, Armenian Street, Chennai – 600 001 .. Petitioner Vs. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) (FAC) Zone I, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006. .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the files of the Respondent herein in R.C.No.10591/1997/A5 dated 01.02.2012, communicating the notice of attachment in Form 5 and notice for sale of land in Form 7, quashing the same as illegal and without jurisdiction.
For Petitioner .. Mr.N.Inbarajan For Respondent .. Mr.M.Ezhumalai (Govt.Advocate)
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to the following effect: “May be permit to withdraw this writ petition”.
Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
smv
To
The Deputy Commissioner (CT) (FAC) Zone I, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006.
+1cc to Mr.N.Inbarajan, Advocate, S.R.No. 16275
W.P.No.7538 of 2012
RV(CO) GN(22/02/2019)
Binny Limited
The Deputy Commissioner (CT) (FAC) Zone I, Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
