The writ petition was closed as the petitioner's counsel endorsed that nothing survives further for adjudication, rendering the matter infructuous. No costs were awarded.
Writ Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition closed with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
lIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.09.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P. No.7512 of 2012 & M.P. No.1 of 2012
P.Prabakaran
...Petitioner
Vs
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents their men and agents not to bring the petitioner's 7/36 share, for public auction, in the property in Ward No7, Natham R.S.No.41/4, within Chithode Panchayat Board Limit at Naduppalayam, Chithode Village, Erode Taluk and District.
For Petitioner : Ms.P.Dhanalakshmi
for Mr.V.S.Kesavan
For Respondents : Mr.Hariharan, G.A.
Ms.Dhanalakshmi, learned counsel, who represents the learned counsel for the petitioner on record, states that nothing survives further for adjudication in the Writ Petition and thus become rendered infructuous. She has made an endorsement to that effect.
s/dAssistant Registrar(CS VI)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
sl
To
+1 CC to The Spl. Govt. Pleader sr 80795.
W.P. No.7512 of 2012
& M.P. No.1 of 2012
RGN(CO)
SP(22/10/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Prabakaran
The State of Tamilnadu, rep. By Deputy Commissioner (CT), Salem Division, Salem
Asst. Commissioner (CT), Commercial Tax Office, Chithode Circle, Erode – 1
DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
