Disposed

S.Padmapriya v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC13 Mar 2019WP/7357/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in a writ petition, directed the police to release a seized JCB within 7 days upon compliance of specific conditions including depositing money, executing a bond, and not alienating the vehicle to mitigate value loss.

What did the court decide?

Release of the seized JCB within 7 days upon deposit of Rs.50,000, bond of Rs.10,000, and undertaking against illegal use.

S.Padmapriya Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13.03.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶7

W.P.No.7357 of 2019

¶8

S.Padmapriya .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Cheyyar - 604 407
Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Anakkavoor Police Station,
Thiruvannamalai District. .. Respondents

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to release the JCB bearing Registration No.TN 25 BZ 2251 which was seized by the 2nd respondent on 22.08.2018. For petitioner :Mr.T.Gopinathan For respondents : Mr.D.Raghu, Government Advocate

¶10

ORDER

¶11

(The Order of the Court was made by R.Subbiah,J)

¶12

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to release the JCB bearing Registration No.TN 25 BZ 2251 which was seized by the 2nd respondent on 22.08.2018.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

According to the petitioner, the respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 22.08.2018 on the ground of illegal mining and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had been passed by the respondents. Hence, she has come forward with the present Writ Petition.

¶16

On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like river sand and there was no valid permit and hence the vehicle was seized. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous case.

¶17

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the respondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish its value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.

¶18

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii) :

¶19

(i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.

¶20

(ii) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.

¶21

(iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondent(s)/authority concerned stating that she will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents and also the trial Court, failing which the respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle.

¶22

(iv) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned.

¶23

(v) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

¶26

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶27

//True Copy//

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar
cs/nvi
To
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Cheyyar - 604 407
Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Anakkavoor Police Station,
Thiruvannamalai District.
+1cc to Mr.T.Gopinathan, Advocate Sr.73552
W.P.No.7357 of 2019
srg 20/03/2019

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Padmapriya v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Padmapriya v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Santhi Vs the Director General of Police

K.Mogiliyammal Vs the Superintendent of Police

Vijeth Dhinakaran, Vs The Tahsildhar

A.Pari Vs The District Collector

P.Kandan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

K.Srinivasan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer