Petition filed under Article 226 for quashing of orders affecting the petitioner's service as a Jeep Driver. Petitioner's counsel stated no instruction from the absent petitioner and withdrew the request.
Petition dismissed for no instruction from the petitioner. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
W.P.No.7148 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2008
G.Madhu .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Chennai-600 015. 2.The Conservator of Forests, Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri. 3.The District Forest Officer, Harur Division, Harur, Dharmapuri District. 4.The District Employment Officer, Dharmapuri. .. Respondents
Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the orders in (1) Na.Ka.No.1466/2006/Po.3 dated 03.03.2008 of the second respondent and (2) Na.Ka.No.992/2006/Pa.1 dated 04.03.2008 of the third respondent, quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to serve as Jeep Driver, Office of the District Forest Officer, Harur Division, Dharmapuri District.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For respondents : Ms.Thangavadhana Balakrishnan, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, responded to the objections raised by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the request of the petitioner for regularisation cannot be considered since he has been absconding, after committing an accident and that he is not in service, fairly submitted that he is not pressing the petition as he has not received any instruction from the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for no instruction. Consequently, connected M.Ps are closed. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
Panagal Buildings,
Chennai-600 015.
2.The Conservator of Forests,
Dharmapuri Circle,
Dharmapuri.
3.The District Forest Officer,
Harur Division,
Harur, Dharmapuri District.
4.The District Employment Officer,
Dharmapuri.
W.P.No.7148 of 2008 and
M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2008
RGN(CO)
CS/21/06/2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can entertain a petition for regularisation of service when the petitioner is absent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Madhu
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
The Conservator of Forests, Dharmapuri Circle
The District Forest Officer, Harur Division
The District Employment Officer, Dharmapuri
T. Raja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
